Pick Claude Opus 4.8 for agentic coding and multi-file debugging or long autonomous tasks. Pick Grok 4.3 for video understanding from native video input or generating pdf, pptx, and xlsx files directly. On a tight budget at scale, Grok 4.3 is the value pick.
Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.3 (xAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Opus 4.8 is the agentic-coding and judgment leader — highest SWE-Bench Pro score ever recorded at launch. Grok 4.3 is the current xAI flagship: 1M context, native video input, file generation, and live X data, ahead of the still-unreleased Grok 5. Their biggest split is price, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.
Key differences
Price: Grok 4.3 is about 4× cheaper on input ($1.25/$2.5 per 1M tokens vs $5/$25 per 1M tokens) — meaningful once you are processing millions of tokens a month.
Context window: both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Tie on paper — test on your own long inputs, since usable recall varies by model.
Recency: Claude Opus 4.8 is the newer model by about 28 days (released May 28, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Specifications
Spec
Claude Opus 4.8
Grok 4.3
Provider
Anthropic (US)
xAI (US)
Released
May 28, 2026
April 30, 2026
Context window
1M (~1,500 pages)
1M (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)
$5/$25 per 1M tokens
$1.25/$2.5 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
No — API only
No — API only
Modalities
text, image, code
text, image, video, code
SWE-Bench Verified
88.6%
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Agentic coding and multi-file debugging: Claude Opus 4.8 — A core design strength of Claude Opus 4.8.
Long autonomous tasks: Claude Opus 4.8 — A core design strength of Claude Opus 4.8.
Honest uncertainty flagging: Claude Opus 4.8 — A core design strength of Claude Opus 4.8.
Video understanding from native video input: Grok 4.3 — A core design strength of Grok 4.3.
Generating PDF, PPTX, and XLSX files directly: Grok 4.3 — A core design strength of Grok 4.3.
Real-time questions using live X data: Grok 4.3 — A core design strength of Grok 4.3.
Lowest cost at scale: Grok 4.3 — At $1.25/$2.5 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume: Grok 4.3 — At $1.25/$2.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Opus 4.8, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Anyone whose priority is agentic coding and multi-file debugging: Claude Opus 4.8 — It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is video understanding from native video input: Grok 4.3 — That is its strongest area.
Claude Opus 4.8: where it fits
The agentic-coding and judgment leader — highest SWE-Bench Pro score ever recorded at launch. Released May 28, 2026 by Anthropic, it is built for agentic coding and multi-file debugging, long autonomous tasks, honest uncertainty flagging, and professional writing and reasoning.
Its trade-offs are real: highest per-token price of the frontier tier, and not the cheapest for high-volume work. At $5 in / $25 out per million tokens, it sits in the premium price band.
Grok 4.3: where it fits
The current xAI flagship: 1M context, native video input, file generation, and live X data, ahead of the still-unreleased Grok 5. Released April 30, 2026 by xAI, it is built for video understanding from native video input, generating PDF, PPTX, and XLSX files directly, real-time questions using live X data, and long-context, multi-agent reasoning.
Its trade-offs: higher context pricing on requests above 200K tokens, and less independent benchmark coverage than OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google. At $1.25 in / $2.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.3 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Grok 4.3 costs less per token; and each leads in its own area — Claude Opus 4.8 for agentic coding and multi-file debugging, Grok 4.3 for video understanding from native video input. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 4.8 or Grok 4.3 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Grok 4.3, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Opus 4.8 leans toward agentic coding and multi-file debugging while Grok 4.3 leans toward video understanding from native video input, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Grok 4.3?
Grok 4.3 is cheaper — $5/$25 per 1M tokens vs $1.25/$2.5 per 1M tokens, roughly 4× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.
Can I use both Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.3 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Opus 4.8, Grok 4.3 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Claude Opus 4.8 or Grok 4.3?
Claude Opus 4.8 — released May 28, 2026, about 28 days after Grok 4.3.
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.3
Anthropic · US | xAI · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Claude Opus 4.8 for agentic coding and multi-file debugging or long autonomous tasks. Pick Grok 4.3 for video understanding from native video input or generating pdf, pptx, and xlsx files directly. On a tight budget at scale, Grok 4.3 is the value pick.
Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.3 (xAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Opus 4.8 is the agentic-coding and judgment leader — highest SWE-Bench Pro score ever recorded at launch. Grok 4.3 is the current xAI flagship: 1M context, native video input, file generation, and live X data, ahead of the still-unreleased Grok 5. Their biggest split is price, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.
Key differences at a glance
▸Price: Grok 4.3 is about 4× cheaper on input ($1.25/$2.5 per 1M tokens vs $5/$25 per 1M tokens) — meaningful once you are processing millions of tokens a month.
▸Context window: both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Tie on paper — test on your own long inputs, since usable recall varies by model.
▸Recency: Claude Opus 4.8 is the newer model by about 28 days (released May 28, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
Spec
Claude Opus 4.8
Grok 4.3
Provider
Anthropic (US)
xAI (US)
Released
May 28, 2026
April 30, 2026
Context window
1M (~1,500 pages)
1M (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)
$5/$25 per 1M tokens
$1.25/$2.5 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
No — API only
No — API only
Modalities
text, image, code
text, image, video, code
SWE-Bench Verified
88.6%
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Agentic coding and multi-file debugging
Claude Opus 4.8
A core design strength of Claude Opus 4.8.
Long autonomous tasks
Claude Opus 4.8
A core design strength of Claude Opus 4.8.
Honest uncertainty flagging
Claude Opus 4.8
A core design strength of Claude Opus 4.8.
Video understanding from native video input
Grok 4.3
A core design strength of Grok 4.3.
Generating PDF, PPTX, and XLSX files directly
Grok 4.3
A core design strength of Grok 4.3.
Real-time questions using live X data
Grok 4.3
A core design strength of Grok 4.3.
Lowest cost at scale
Grok 4.3
At $1.25/$2.5 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ Grok 4.3
At $1.25/$2.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Opus 4.8, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Anyone whose priority is agentic coding and multi-file debugging
→ Claude Opus 4.8
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is video understanding from native video input
→ Grok 4.3
That is its strongest area.
Claude Opus 4.8: where it fits
The agentic-coding and judgment leader — highest SWE-Bench Pro score ever recorded at launch. Released May 28, 2026 by Anthropic, it is built for agentic coding and multi-file debugging, long autonomous tasks, honest uncertainty flagging, and professional writing and reasoning.
Its trade-offs are real: highest per-token price of the frontier tier, and not the cheapest for high-volume work. At $5 in / $25 out per million tokens, it sits in the premium price band.
Grok 4.3: where it fits
The current xAI flagship: 1M context, native video input, file generation, and live X data, ahead of the still-unreleased Grok 5. Released April 30, 2026 by xAI, it is built for video understanding from native video input, generating PDF, PPTX, and XLSX files directly, real-time questions using live X data, and long-context, multi-agent reasoning.
Its trade-offs: higher context pricing on requests above 200K tokens, and less independent benchmark coverage than OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google. At $1.25 in / $2.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.3 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Grok 4.3 costs less per token; and each leads in its own area — Claude Opus 4.8 for agentic coding and multi-file debugging, Grok 4.3 for video understanding from native video input. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.3 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Grok 4.3, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Opus 4.8 leans toward agentic coding and multi-file debugging while Grok 4.3 leans toward video understanding from native video input, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Grok 4.3?
Grok 4.3 is cheaper — $5/$25 per 1M tokens vs $1.25/$2.5 per 1M tokens, roughly 4× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.
Can I use both Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.3 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Opus 4.8, Grok 4.3 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Claude Opus 4.8 or Grok 4.3?
Claude Opus 4.8 — released May 28, 2026, about 28 days after Grok 4.3.
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.