Claude Opus 4.7 vs Mistral Large 4

Anthropic · US  |  Mistral AI · France · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for long-running agentic coding workflows or precise instruction following. Pick Mistral Large 4 for mistral's largest model to date — 1.05t total parameters, 49b active per token (granular moe), plus a 1.6b-parameter vision encoder or trained from scratch on 3,800 nvidia grace blackwell gpus in mistral's own european data centers, across 160+ languages. On a tight budget at scale, Mistral Large 4 is the value pick.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic, US) and Mistral Large 4 (Mistral AI, France) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. Claude Opus 4.7 is the agentic-coding-focused Opus that traded some long-context recall for long-run reliability. Mistral Large 4 is mistral's October 6, 2026 public preview of 'Le Chonk' — a 1.05T-parameter, natively multimodal MoE model with open weights planned by month's end. Their biggest split is price, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Opus 4.7Mistral Large 4
ProviderAnthropic (US) Mistral AI (France)
ReleasedApril 16, 2026 October 6, 2026
Context window1M (~1,500 pages) 1M tokens (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)$5/$25 per 1M tokens $0.68/$2.09 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench Verified87.6% Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Long-running agentic coding workflows

Claude Opus 4.7

Mistral Large 4 is comparatively weak here — scores 61.7% on DeepSWE v1.1, trailing DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (74.2%) and Kimi K3 (68.0%) on that coding benchmark

Precise instruction following

Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 lists precise instruction following among its strengths; Mistral Large 4 does not.

Task budgets and effort tiers

Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 lists task budgets and effort tiers among its strengths; Mistral Large 4 does not.

Mistral's largest model to date — 1.05T total parameters, 49B active per token (granular MoE), plus a 1.6B-parameter vision encoder

Mistral Large 4

Mistral's October 6, 2026 public preview of 'Le Chonk' — a 1.05T-parameter, natively multimodal MoE model with open weights planned by month's end — and it runs cheaper at $0.68/$2.09 per 1M tokens.

Trained from scratch on 3,800 Nvidia Grace Blackwell GPUs in Mistral's own European data centers, across 160+ languages

Mistral Large 4

Mistral's October 6, 2026 public preview of 'Le Chonk' — a 1.05T-parameter, natively multimodal MoE model with open weights planned by month's end — and it is the newer of the two.

Hybrid instruct/reasoning design — answers quickly by default or switches into step-by-step reasoning

Mistral Large 4

Mistral Large 4 lists hybrid instruct/reasoning design — answers quickly by default or switches into step-by-step reasoning among its strengths; Claude Opus 4.7 does not.

Lowest cost at scale

Mistral Large 4

At $0.68/$2.09 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ Mistral Large 4

At $0.68/$2.09 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Opus 4.7, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Anyone whose priority is long-running agentic coding workflows

→ Claude Opus 4.7

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is mistral's largest model to date — 1.05t total parameters, 49b active per token (granular moe), plus a 1.6b-parameter vision encoder

→ Mistral Large 4

That is its strongest area.

An enterprise with regional data-residency rules

→ Claude Opus 4.7 or Mistral Large 4

Origin (US vs France) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.

Claude Opus 4.7: where it fits

The agentic-coding-focused Opus that traded some long-context recall for long-run reliability. Released April 16, 2026 by Anthropic, it is built for long-running agentic coding workflows, precise instruction following, task budgets and effort tiers, and large-codebase operation.

Its trade-offs are real: long-context recall regressed vs 4.6, and superseded by Opus 4.8. At $5 in / $25 out per million tokens, it sits in the premium price band.

Mistral Large 4: where it fits

Mistral's October 6, 2026 public preview of 'Le Chonk' — a 1.05T-parameter, natively multimodal MoE model with open weights planned by month's end. Released October 6, 2026 by Mistral AI, it is built for mistral's largest model to date — 1.05T total parameters, 49B active per token (granular MoE), plus a 1.6B-parameter vision encoder, trained from scratch on 3,800 Nvidia Grace Blackwell GPUs in Mistral's own European data centers, across 160+ languages, hybrid instruct/reasoning design — answers quickly by default or switches into step-by-step reasoning, and open weights planned by end of October 2026, which would make it among the largest open-weight models available.

Its trade-offs: still a public preview, not a finished release — Mistral says training is ongoing with 'no signs of saturation', weights not yet shipped as of mid-October 2026 — API-only for now despite the open-weight framing, launch pricing ($0.68/$2.09 per million) is a preview discount — Mistral's own model page lists a $1.36/$4.18 list price once the promotion ends, and scores 61.7% on DeepSWE v1.1, trailing DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (74.2%) and Kimi K3 (68.0%) on that coding benchmark. At $0.68 in / $2.09 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

This is less "which is smarter" and more "which ecosystem fits." Claude Opus 4.7 (US) and Mistral Large 4 (France) differ on pricing philosophy, data-residency, and tooling as much as on raw scores. Mistral Large 4 is the cheaper option, which matters at volume. The pragmatic move is to run one real task through both and judge the outputs against your own constraints — including where your data is allowed to be processed.

Want both Claude Opus 4.7 and Mistral Large 4 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Mistral Large 4 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Mistral Large 4, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Opus 4.7 leans toward long-running agentic coding workflows while Mistral Large 4 leans toward mistral's largest model to date — 1.05t total parameters, 49b active per token (granular moe), plus a 1.6b-parameter vision encoder, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4 is cheaper — $5/$25 per 1M tokens vs $0.68/$2.09 per 1M tokens, roughly 7.4× apart on input.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both Claude Opus 4.7 and Mistral Large 4 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Opus 4.7, Mistral Large 4 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Claude Opus 4.7 or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4 — released October 6, 2026, about 6 months after Claude Opus 4.7.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.