Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok Code Fast 1
Anthropic · US | xAI · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for long-running agentic coding workflows or precise instruction following. Pick Grok Code Fast 1 for fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50 or low-latency code generation and terminal tasks. On a tight budget at scale, Grok Code Fast 1 is the value pick.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic) and Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Opus 4.7 is the agentic-coding-focused Opus that traded some long-context recall for long-run reliability. Grok Code Fast 1 is xAI's speed-tier coding model at $0.20/$1.50 with a 256K window — cheap, fast agentic code over frontier quality. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
- ▸Price: Grok Code Fast 1 is about 25× cheaper on input ($0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens vs $5/$25 per 1M tokens) — a large enough gap that at scale it can be the single biggest line item in the decision.
- ▸Context window: Claude Opus 4.7 holds 3.9× more — 1M (~1,500 pages) vs 256K (~384 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
- ▸Recency: Claude Opus 4.7 is the newer model by about 8 months (released April 16, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | Grok Code Fast 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic (US) | xAI (US) |
| Released | April 16, 2026 | August 28, 2025 |
| Context window | 1M (~1,500 pages) | 256K (~384 pages) |
| Price (in/out) | $5/$25 per 1M tokens | $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens |
| Open weight? | No — API only | No — API only |
| Modalities | text, image, code | text, code |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 87.6% | Not published |
| MRCR v2 @ 1M | Not published | Not published |
Who wins what
Long-running agentic coding workflows
Claude Opus 4.7
Its 1M window holds about 3.9× more than Grok Code Fast 1's 256K in a single prompt.
Precise instruction following
Claude Opus 4.7
The agentic-coding-focused Opus that traded some long-context recall for long-run reliability — and it carries the larger 1M context.
Task budgets and effort tiers
Claude Opus 4.7
The agentic-coding-focused Opus that traded some long-context recall for long-run reliability — and it is the newer of the two.
Fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50
Grok Code Fast 1
At $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Opus 4.7 ($5/$25 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.
Low-latency code generation and terminal tasks
Grok Code Fast 1
XAI's speed-tier coding model at $0.20/$1.50 with a 256K window — cheap, fast agentic code over frontier quality — and it runs cheaper at $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens.
High-volume coding pipelines where speed beats peak quality
Grok Code Fast 1
Grok Code Fast 1 lists high-volume coding pipelines where speed beats peak quality among its strengths; Claude Opus 4.7 does not.
Lowest cost at scale
Grok Code Fast 1
At $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input
Claude Opus 4.7
Its 1M window is about 3.9× larger than Grok Code Fast 1's 256K, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ Grok Code Fast 1
At $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Opus 4.7, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ Claude Opus 4.7
Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is long-running agentic coding workflows
→ Claude Opus 4.7
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50
→ Grok Code Fast 1
That is its strongest area.
Claude Opus 4.7: where it fits
The agentic-coding-focused Opus that traded some long-context recall for long-run reliability. Released April 16, 2026 by Anthropic, it is built for long-running agentic coding workflows, precise instruction following, task budgets and effort tiers, and large-codebase operation.
Its trade-offs are real: long-context recall regressed vs 4.6, and superseded by Opus 4.8. At $5 in / $25 out per million tokens, it sits in the premium price band.
Grok Code Fast 1: where it fits
XAI's speed-tier coding model at $0.20/$1.50 with a 256K window — cheap, fast agentic code over frontier quality. Released August 28, 2025 by xAI, it is built for fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50, low-latency code generation and terminal tasks, high-volume coding pipelines where speed beats peak quality, and a 256K window sized for real codebases.
Its trade-offs: text and code only — no image, audio or video input, xAI did not publish a SWE-Bench Verified score, a speed-tier coding model, not a frontier reasoner, and narrow focus — built for code, not general knowledge work. At $0.2 in / $1.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok Code Fast 1 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Grok Code Fast 1 costs less per token; Claude Opus 4.7 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Claude Opus 4.7 for long-running agentic coding workflows, Grok Code Fast 1 for fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok Code Fast 1 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
See pricingFrequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Grok Code Fast 1 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Grok Code Fast 1, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Opus 4.7 leans toward long-running agentic coding workflows while Grok Code Fast 1 leans toward fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Grok Code Fast 1?
Grok Code Fast 1 is cheaper — $5/$25 per 1M tokens vs $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens, roughly 25× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Opus 4.7 — 1M vs 256K, about 3.9× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok Code Fast 1 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Opus 4.7, Grok Code Fast 1 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Claude Opus 4.7 or Grok Code Fast 1?
Claude Opus 4.7 — released April 16, 2026, about 8 months after Grok Code Fast 1.
Related comparisons
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.