Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4

Anthropic · US  |  OpenAI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for long-running agentic coding workflows or precise instruction following. Pick GPT-5.4 for strong general-purpose default or coding and software engineering. On a tight budget at scale, GPT-5.4 is the value pick.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.4 (OpenAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Opus 4.7 is the agentic-coding-focused Opus that traded some long-context recall for long-run reliability. GPT-5.4 is openAI's 2026 workhorse — unifies Codex and GPT into a strong default that costs half of GPT-5.5. Their biggest split is price, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Opus 4.7GPT-5.4
ProviderAnthropic (US) OpenAI (US)
ReleasedApril 2026 March 5, 2026
Context window1M (~1,500 pages) 1M (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)$5/$25 per 1M tokens $2.5/$15 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M32.2% Not published

Who wins what

Long-running agentic coding workflows

Claude Opus 4.7

A core design strength of Claude Opus 4.7.

Precise instruction following

Claude Opus 4.7

A core design strength of Claude Opus 4.7.

Task budgets and effort tiers

Claude Opus 4.7

A core design strength of Claude Opus 4.7.

Strong general-purpose default

GPT-5.4

A core design strength of GPT-5.4.

Coding and software engineering

GPT-5.4

A core design strength of GPT-5.4.

Document understanding and tool use

GPT-5.4

A core design strength of GPT-5.4.

Lowest cost at scale

GPT-5.4

At $2.5/$15 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

GPT-5.4

At $2.5/$15 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Opus 4.7, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Anyone whose priority is long-running agentic coding workflows

Claude Opus 4.7

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is strong general-purpose default

GPT-5.4

That is its strongest area.

Claude Opus 4.7: where it fits

The agentic-coding-focused Opus that traded some long-context recall for long-run reliability. Released April 2026 by Anthropic, it is built for long-running agentic coding workflows, precise instruction following, task budgets and effort tiers, and large-codebase operation.

Its trade-offs are real: long-context recall regressed vs 4.6, and superseded by Opus 4.8. At $5 in / $25 out per million tokens, it sits in the premium price band.

GPT-5.4: where it fits

OpenAI's 2026 workhorse — unifies Codex and GPT into a strong default that costs half of GPT-5.5. Released March 5, 2026 by OpenAI, it is built for strong general-purpose default, coding and software engineering, document understanding and tool use, and 1M context with good token efficiency.

Its trade-offs: topped by GPT-5.5 on the hardest tasks, and pricier than open-weight rivals. At $2.5 in / $15 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.4 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. GPT-5.4 costs less per token; and each leads in its own area — Claude Opus 4.7 for long-running agentic coding workflows, GPT-5.4 for strong general-purpose default. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.4 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Opus 4.7 leans toward long-running agentic coding workflows while GPT-5.4 leans toward strong general-purpose default, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4?

GPT-5.4 is cheaper — $5/$25 per 1M tokens vs $2.5/$15 per 1M tokens, roughly 2× apart on input.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.4 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.4 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4?

Claude Opus 4.7 — released April 2026, about 43 days after GPT-5.4.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.