Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-4.1 Mini
Anthropic · US | OpenAI · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for long-running agentic coding workflows or precise instruction following. Pick GPT-4.1 Mini for very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens or instruction following above its weight class — 84.1% on ifeval, beating gpt-4o. On a tight budget at scale, GPT-4.1 Mini is the value pick.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic) and GPT-4.1 Mini (OpenAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Opus 4.7 is the agentic-coding-focused Opus that traded some long-context recall for long-run reliability. GPT-4.1 Mini is a cheap, fast 1M-context workhorse with strong instruction following but weak coding — already retired from ChatGPT. They diverge most on price, context window and coding benchmarks — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
- ▸Price: GPT-4.1 Mini is about 13× cheaper on input ($0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens vs $5/$25 per 1M tokens) — a large enough gap that at scale it can be the single biggest line item in the decision.
- ▸Context window: 1M vs 1M — within a few percent of each other, so treat this as a tie and test on your own long inputs, since usable recall varies by model.
- ▸Coding: Claude Opus 4.7 leads SWE-Bench Verified by 64.0 points (87.6% vs 23.6%) — a real edge on hard, real-world software tasks.
- ▸Recency: Claude Opus 4.7 is the newer model by about 12 months (released April 16, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic (US) | OpenAI (US) |
| Released | April 16, 2026 | April 14, 2025 |
| Context window | 1M (~1,500 pages) | 1M (~1,571 pages) |
| Price (in/out) | $5/$25 per 1M tokens | $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens |
| Open weight? | No — API only | No — API only |
| Modalities | text, image, code | text, image, code |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 87.6% | 23.6% |
| MRCR v2 @ 1M | Not published | Not published |
Who wins what
Long-running agentic coding workflows
Claude Opus 4.7
It scores 87.6% on SWE-Bench Verified against GPT-4.1 Mini's 23.6% — a 64-point edge on real repository work.
Precise instruction following
Claude Opus 4.7
The agentic-coding-focused Opus that traded some long-context recall for long-run reliability — and it leads SWE-Bench Verified 87.6% to 23.6%.
Task budgets and effort tiers
Claude Opus 4.7
The agentic-coding-focused Opus that traded some long-context recall for long-run reliability — and it is the newer of the two.
Very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens
GPT-4.1 Mini
At $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Opus 4.7 ($5/$25 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.
Instruction following above its weight class — 84.1% on IFEval, beating GPT-4o
GPT-4.1 Mini
A cheap, fast 1M-context workhorse with strong instruction following but weak coding — already retired from ChatGPT — and it runs cheaper at $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens.
Multi-turn coherence for its tier — 35.8% on MultiChallenge, roughly 1.8x GPT-4o mini
GPT-4.1 Mini
GPT-4.1 Mini lists multi-turn coherence for its tier — 35.8% on MultiChallenge, roughly 1.8x GPT-4o mini among its strengths; Claude Opus 4.7 does not.
Lowest cost at scale
GPT-4.1 Mini
At $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ GPT-4.1 Mini
At $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Opus 4.7, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ GPT-4.1 Mini
Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is long-running agentic coding workflows
→ Claude Opus 4.7
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens
→ GPT-4.1 Mini
That is its strongest area.
Claude Opus 4.7: where it fits
The agentic-coding-focused Opus that traded some long-context recall for long-run reliability. Released April 16, 2026 by Anthropic, it is built for long-running agentic coding workflows, precise instruction following, task budgets and effort tiers, and large-codebase operation.
Its trade-offs are real: long-context recall regressed vs 4.6, and superseded by Opus 4.8. At $5 in / $25 out per million tokens, it sits in the premium price band.
GPT-4.1 Mini: where it fits
A cheap, fast 1M-context workhorse with strong instruction following but weak coding — already retired from ChatGPT. Released April 14, 2025 by OpenAI, it is built for very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens, instruction following above its weight class — 84.1% on IFEval, beating GPT-4o, multi-turn coherence for its tier — 35.8% on MultiChallenge, roughly 1.8x GPT-4o mini, and a full 1M context at flat pricing, with no long-context premium.
Its trade-offs: weak at agentic coding — its 23.6% on SWE-Bench Verified sits below GPT-4o's 33.2%, retired from ChatGPT in February 2026, and OpenAI's own docs now point users to GPT-5 mini instead, and a June 2024 knowledge cutoff, now roughly two years stale, and no reasoning mode. At $0.4 in / $1.6 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-4.1 Mini overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. GPT-4.1 Mini costs less per token; GPT-4.1 Mini holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Claude Opus 4.7 for long-running agentic coding workflows, GPT-4.1 Mini for very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-4.1 Mini without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
See pricingFrequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-4.1 Mini better for coding?
On SWE-Bench Verified, Claude Opus 4.7 scores 87.6% and GPT-4.1 Mini scores 23.6% — Claude Opus 4.7 has the measurable edge.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-4.1 Mini?
GPT-4.1 Mini is cheaper — $5/$25 per 1M tokens vs $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens, roughly 13× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
Effectively neither — 1M vs 1M is a difference of a few percent. Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.
Can I use both Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-4.1 Mini together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-4.1 Mini and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-4.1 Mini?
Claude Opus 4.7 — released April 16, 2026, about 12 months after GPT-4.1 Mini.
Related comparisons
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.