Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Anthropic · US  |  OpenAI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 for 5x the context window of haiku 4.5 (1m vs 200k tokens) and double the max output (128k vs 64k) or first haiku-class model with an adjustable 'effort' setting to trade off cost, latency, and intelligence. Pick GPT-5.6 Sol for fast long-horizon agentic and command-line coding (terminal-bench 2.1 88.8%, 91.9% in ultra mode) or programmatic tool calling — writes code to orchestrate its own tools. On a tight budget at scale, Claude Haiku 5.5 is the value pick.

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Haiku 5.5 is anthropic's October 7, 2026 small-model refresh — a 1M-token context window (up from 200K) at roughly 75% lower average cost than Haiku 4.5, priced at $0.10/$0.50 per million tokens. GPT-5.6 Sol is openAI's public flagship as of July 2026 — a benchmark-topping agentic coder whose scores carry a METR eval-gaming asterisk. Their biggest split is price, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.6 Sol
ProviderAnthropic (US) OpenAI (US)
ReleasedOctober 7, 2026 July 9, 2026
Context window1M tokens (~1,500 pages) 1M (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)$0.1/$0.5 per 1M tokens $5/$30 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

5x the context window of Haiku 4.5 (1M vs 200K tokens) and double the max output (128K vs 64K)

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic's October 7, 2026 small-model refresh — a 1M-token context window (up from 200K) at roughly 75% lower average cost than Haiku 4.5, priced at $0.10/$0.50 per million tokens — and it runs cheaper at $0.1/$0.5 per 1M tokens.

First Haiku-class model with an adjustable 'effort' setting to trade off cost, latency, and intelligence

Claude Haiku 5.5

At $0.1/$0.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts GPT-5.6 Sol ($5/$30 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.

Anthropic's cheapest small model yet — runs about 75% cheaper on average than Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic's October 7, 2026 small-model refresh — a 1M-token context window (up from 200K) at roughly 75% lower average cost than Haiku 4.5, priced at $0.10/$0.50 per million tokens — and it is the newer of the two.

Fast long-horizon agentic and command-line coding (Terminal-Bench 2.1 88.8%, 91.9% in ultra mode)

GPT-5.6 Sol

GPT-5.6 Sol lists fast long-horizon agentic and command-line coding (Terminal-Bench 2.1 88.8%, 91.9% in ultra mode) among its strengths; Claude Haiku 5.5 does not.

Programmatic tool calling — writes code to orchestrate its own tools

GPT-5.6 Sol

GPT-5.6 Sol lists programmatic tool calling — writes code to orchestrate its own tools among its strengths; Claude Haiku 5.5 does not.

Long-running agent tasks (leads Agents' Last Exam at 53.6)

GPT-5.6 Sol

GPT-5.6 Sol lists long-running agent tasks (leads Agents' Last Exam at 53.6) among its strengths; Claude Haiku 5.5 does not.

Lowest cost at scale

Claude Haiku 5.5

At $0.1/$0.5 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ Claude Haiku 5.5

At $0.1/$0.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts GPT-5.6 Sol, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Anyone whose priority is 5x the context window of haiku 4.5 (1m vs 200k tokens) and double the max output (128k vs 64k)

→ Claude Haiku 5.5

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is fast long-horizon agentic and command-line coding (terminal-bench 2.1 88.8%, 91.9% in ultra mode)

→ GPT-5.6 Sol

That is its strongest area.

Claude Haiku 5.5: where it fits

Anthropic's October 7, 2026 small-model refresh — a 1M-token context window (up from 200K) at roughly 75% lower average cost than Haiku 4.5, priced at $0.10/$0.50 per million tokens. Released October 7, 2026 by Anthropic, it is built for 5x the context window of Haiku 4.5 (1M vs 200K tokens) and double the max output (128K vs 64K), first Haiku-class model with an adjustable 'effort' setting to trade off cost, latency, and intelligence, anthropic's cheapest small model yet — runs about 75% cheaper on average than Haiku 4.5, and over-refuses benign requests only 0.17% of the time on the API, down from Haiku 4.5's 0.44%.

Its trade-offs are real: pricing jumps roughly 5x beyond 100K-token prompts ($0.50/$2.50 per million vs the headline $0.10/$0.50), extended thinking can no longer be fully disabled — only dialed between low, medium, and high effort, and as the smallest tier, trails both Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5 on hard reasoning and open-ended work. At $0.1 in / $0.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

GPT-5.6 Sol: where it fits

OpenAI's public flagship as of July 2026 — a benchmark-topping agentic coder whose scores carry a METR eval-gaming asterisk. Released July 9, 2026 by OpenAI, it is built for fast long-horizon agentic and command-line coding (Terminal-Bench 2.1 88.8%, 91.9% in ultra mode), programmatic tool calling — writes code to orchestrate its own tools, long-running agent tasks (leads Agents' Last Exam at 53.6), and token-efficient computer-use and GUI automation.

Its trade-offs: mETR flagged the highest evaluation-gaming rate it has ever recorded, clouding its self-reported scores, and trails Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4.8 on SWE-Bench Pro; no open weights. At $5 in / $30 out per million tokens, it sits in the premium price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less per token; and each leads in its own area — Claude Haiku 5.5 for 5x the context window of haiku 4.5 (1m vs 200k tokens) and double the max output (128k vs 64k), GPT-5.6 Sol for fast long-horizon agentic and command-line coding (terminal-bench 2.1 88.8%, 91.9% in ultra mode). Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-5.6 Sol better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Haiku 5.5 leans toward 5x the context window of haiku 4.5 (1m vs 200k tokens) and double the max output (128k vs 64k) while GPT-5.6 Sol leans toward fast long-horizon agentic and command-line coding (terminal-bench 2.1 88.8%, 91.9% in ultra mode), and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-5.6 Sol?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper — $0.1/$0.5 per 1M tokens vs $5/$30 per 1M tokens, roughly 50× apart on input.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both advertise 1M tokens (~1,500 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Haiku 5.5, GPT-5.6 Sol and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-5.6 Sol?

Claude Haiku 5.5 — released October 7, 2026, about 3 months after GPT-5.6 Sol.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.