Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5

Anthropic · US  |  OpenAI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Claude Fable 5 for the hardest reasoning and most complex problems or long-horizon, multi-step agentic work. Pick GPT-5.5 for terminal, cli and computer-use automation or long-horizon tool sequencing. On a tight budget at scale, GPT-5.5 is the value pick.

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Fable 5 is anthropic's top public Mythos-class model and its most capable yet, though tier access was temporarily suspended in June 2026 under a US export-control directive. GPT-5.5 is openAI's first fully retrained base since GPT-4.5 — the terminal and computer-use champion. Their biggest split is price, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Fable 5GPT-5.5
ProviderAnthropic (US) OpenAI (US)
ReleasedJune 9, 2026 April 23, 2026
Context window1M (~1,500 pages) 1M (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)$10/$50 per 1M tokens $5/$30 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

The hardest reasoning and most complex problems

Claude Fable 5

GPT-5.5 is comparatively weak here — trails Opus 4.8 on hardest coding benchmarks

Long-horizon, multi-step agentic work

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic's top public Mythos-class model and its most capable yet, though tier access was temporarily suspended in June 2026 under a US export-control directive — and it is the newer of the two.

Frontier-level analysis and research

Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 lists frontier-level analysis and research among its strengths; GPT-5.5 does not.

Terminal, CLI and computer-use automation

GPT-5.5

OpenAI's first fully retrained base since GPT-4.5 — the terminal and computer-use champion — and it runs cheaper at $5/$30 per 1M tokens.

Long-horizon tool sequencing

GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 lists long-horizon tool sequencing among its strengths; Claude Fable 5 does not.

Strong agentic coding and reasoning

GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 lists strong agentic coding and reasoning among its strengths; Claude Fable 5 does not.

Lowest cost at scale

GPT-5.5

At $5/$30 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ GPT-5.5

At $5/$30 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Fable 5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Anyone whose priority is the hardest reasoning and most complex problems

→ Claude Fable 5

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is terminal, cli and computer-use automation

→ GPT-5.5

That is its strongest area.

Claude Fable 5: where it fits

Anthropic's top public Mythos-class model and its most capable yet, though tier access was temporarily suspended in June 2026 under a US export-control directive. Released June 9, 2026 by Anthropic, it is built for the hardest reasoning and most complex problems, long-horizon, multi-step agentic work, frontier-level analysis and research, and work where maximum capability outweighs cost.

Its trade-offs are real: highest price in the Claude lineup, and tier access was temporarily suspended in June 2026 under a US export-control directive. At $10 in / $50 out per million tokens, it sits in the premium price band.

GPT-5.5: where it fits

OpenAI's first fully retrained base since GPT-4.5 — the terminal and computer-use champion. Released April 23, 2026 by OpenAI, it is built for terminal, CLI and computer-use automation, long-horizon tool sequencing, strong agentic coding and reasoning, and browser-driving agents.

Its trade-offs: trails Opus 4.8 on hardest coding benchmarks, and tiered long-context pricing above 272K tokens. At $5 in / $30 out per million tokens, it sits in the premium price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.5 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. GPT-5.5 costs less per token; and each leads in its own area — Claude Fable 5 for the hardest reasoning and most complex problems, GPT-5.5 for terminal, cli and computer-use automation. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.5 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.5 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Fable 5 leans toward the hardest reasoning and most complex problems while GPT-5.5 leans toward terminal, cli and computer-use automation, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.5?

GPT-5.5 is cheaper — $10/$50 per 1M tokens vs $5/$30 per 1M tokens, roughly 2× apart on input.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.5 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Fable 5, GPT-5.5 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.5?

Claude Fable 5 — released June 9, 2026, about 47 days after GPT-5.5.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.