Atria Dawn Preview vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super

Shanghai AI Laboratory · China  |  NVIDIA · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Atria Dawn Preview for best-in-class among tested models on several of shanghai ai lab's own benchmarks, including browsecomp (92.5, ahead of gpt-5.6 sol's 92.2) and deepsearchqa (96.0) or 744b-parameter moe built on a glm-5.2 base, released under a fully open mit license. Pick NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super for high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x gpt-oss-120b) or 1m-token context with strong long-context retrieval (91.6% ruler @ 1m).

Atria Dawn Preview (Shanghai AI Laboratory, China) and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (NVIDIA, US) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. Atria Dawn Preview is a free, MIT-licensed 744B open-weight model from Shanghai AI Lab that beat GPT-5.6 Sol on the BrowseComp benchmark — released quietly, weights before paper. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is nVIDIA's open 120B-total/12B-active hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE built for high-throughput agentic reasoning at 1M-token context. Their biggest split is context window, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecAtria Dawn PreviewNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
ProviderShanghai AI Laboratory (China) NVIDIA (US)
ReleasedSeptember 11, 2026 March 11, 2026
Context window256K tokens (~393 pages) 1M (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)Open weight (self-host / free) Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?Yes — self-hostable Yes — self-hostable
Modalitiestext text, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published 60.47%
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Best-in-class among tested models on several of Shanghai AI Lab's own benchmarks, including BrowseComp (92.5, ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol's 92.2) and DeepSearchQA (96.0)

Atria Dawn Preview

A free, MIT-licensed 744B open-weight model from Shanghai AI Lab that beat GPT-5.6 Sol on the BrowseComp benchmark — released quietly, weights before paper — and it is the newer of the two.

744B-parameter MoE built on a GLM-5.2 base, released under a fully open MIT license

Atria Dawn Preview

Atria Dawn Preview lists 744B-parameter MoE built on a GLM-5.2 base, released under a fully open MIT license among its strengths; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super does not.

Free to self-host — no API pricing, run entirely on your own hardware

Atria Dawn Preview

Atria Dawn Preview lists free to self-host — no API pricing, run entirely on your own hardware among its strengths; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super does not.

High-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x GPT-OSS-120B)

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super

NVIDIA's open 120B-total/12B-active hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE built for high-throughput agentic reasoning at 1M-token context — and it carries the larger 1M context.

1M-token context with strong long-context retrieval (91.6% RULER @ 1M)

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super

Its 1M window holds about 3.8× more than Atria Dawn Preview's 256K tokens in a single prompt.

Strong math reasoning (90.21% AIME 2025)

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super lists strong math reasoning (90.21% AIME 2025) among its strengths; Atria Dawn Preview does not.

Largest single-prompt input

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super

Its 1M window is about 3.8× larger than Atria Dawn Preview's 256K tokens, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super

Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is best-in-class among tested models on several of shanghai ai lab's own benchmarks, including browsecomp (92.5, ahead of gpt-5.6 sol's 92.2) and deepsearchqa (96.0)

Atria Dawn Preview

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x gpt-oss-120b)

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super

That is its strongest area.

An enterprise with regional data-residency rules

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super or Atria Dawn Preview

Origin (China vs US) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.

Atria Dawn Preview: where it fits

A free, MIT-licensed 744B open-weight model from Shanghai AI Lab that beat GPT-5.6 Sol on the BrowseComp benchmark — released quietly, weights before paper. Released September 11, 2026 by Shanghai AI Laboratory, it is built for best-in-class among tested models on several of Shanghai AI Lab's own benchmarks, including BrowseComp (92.5, ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol's 92.2) and DeepSearchQA (96.0), 744B-parameter MoE built on a GLM-5.2 base, released under a fully open MIT license, and free to self-host — no API pricing, run entirely on your own hardware.

Its trade-offs are real: context window is reported inconsistently across trackers — most list 256K tokens, at least one lists 1M; unconfirmed which is accurate, released quietly, with weights and an API posted to GitHub before Shanghai AI Lab's own technical report went up on arXiv days later, and a lab research preview rather than a commercial product — support and update cadence are unclear. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super: where it fits

NVIDIA's open 120B-total/12B-active hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE built for high-throughput agentic reasoning at 1M-token context. Released March 11, 2026 by NVIDIA, it is built for high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x GPT-OSS-120B), 1M-token context with strong long-context retrieval (91.6% RULER @ 1M), strong math reasoning (90.21% AIME 2025), and fully open weights, datasets, and recipes for self-hosting.

Its trade-offs: text-only; no image, audio, or video input, and requires roughly 8x H100-80GB GPUs to self-host at BF16. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.

The bottom line for this matchup

This is less "which is smarter" and more "which ecosystem fits." Atria Dawn Preview (China) and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (US) differ on pricing philosophy, data-residency, and tooling as much as on raw scores. The pragmatic move is to run one real task through both and judge the outputs against your own constraints — including where your data is allowed to be processed.

Want both Atria Dawn Preview and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Atria Dawn Preview or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Atria Dawn Preview, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Atria Dawn Preview leans toward best-in-class among tested models on several of shanghai ai lab's own benchmarks, including browsecomp (92.5, ahead of gpt-5.6 sol's 92.2) and deepsearchqa (96.0) while NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super leans toward high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x gpt-oss-120b), and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Atria Dawn Preview or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super?

They are priced almost identically, so cost will not decide between them.

Which has the bigger context window?

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super — 1M vs 256K tokens, about 3.8× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both Atria Dawn Preview and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Atria Dawn Preview, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Atria Dawn Preview or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super?

Atria Dawn Preview — released September 11, 2026, about 6 months after NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.