Pick Atria Dawn Preview for best-in-class among tested models on several of shanghai ai lab's own benchmarks, including browsecomp (92.5, ahead of gpt-5.6 sol's 92.2) and deepsearchqa (96.0) or 744b-parameter moe built on a glm-5.2 base, released under a fully open mit license. Pick MiMo-V2.5 for native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding or very low cost (~half the inference of the pro tier). On a tight budget at scale, Atria Dawn Preview is the value pick.
Atria Dawn Preview (Shanghai AI Laboratory) and MiMo-V2.5 (Xiaomi) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Atria Dawn Preview is a free, MIT-licensed 744B open-weight model from Shanghai AI Lab that beat GPT-5.6 Sol on the BrowseComp benchmark — released quietly, weights before paper. MiMo-V2.5 is xiaomi's cheap omnimodal model — Pro-level agentic perception across image and video at a fraction of the cost. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences
Context window: MiMo-V2.5 holds 3.8× more — 1M (~1,500 pages) vs 256K tokens (~393 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
Recency: Atria Dawn Preview is the newer model by about 5 months (released September 11, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Specifications
Spec
Atria Dawn Preview
MiMo-V2.5
Provider
Shanghai AI Laboratory (China)
Xiaomi (China)
Released
September 11, 2026
April 22, 2026
Context window
256K tokens (~393 pages)
1M (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)
Open weight (self-host / free)
$0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
Yes — self-hostable
Yes — self-hostable
Modalities
text
text, image, audio, video, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Best-in-class among tested models on several of Shanghai AI Lab's own benchmarks, including BrowseComp (92.5, ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol's 92.2) and DeepSearchQA (96.0): Atria Dawn Preview — A free, MIT-licensed 744B open-weight model from Shanghai AI Lab that beat GPT-5.6 Sol on the BrowseComp benchmark — released quietly, weights before paper — and it is the newer of the two.
744B-parameter MoE built on a GLM-5.2 base, released under a fully open MIT license: Atria Dawn Preview — Atria Dawn Preview lists 744B-parameter MoE built on a GLM-5.2 base, released under a fully open MIT license among its strengths; MiMo-V2.5 does not.
Free to self-host — no API pricing, run entirely on your own hardware: Atria Dawn Preview — Atria Dawn Preview lists free to self-host — no API pricing, run entirely on your own hardware among its strengths; MiMo-V2.5 does not.
Native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding: MiMo-V2.5 — Xiaomi's cheap omnimodal model — Pro-level agentic perception across image and video at a fraction of the cost — and it carries the larger 1M context.
Very low cost (~half the inference of the Pro tier): MiMo-V2.5 — MiMo-V2.5 lists very low cost (~half the inference of the Pro tier) among its strengths; Atria Dawn Preview does not.
Agent-framework integration: MiMo-V2.5 — MiMo-V2.5 lists agent-framework integration among its strengths; Atria Dawn Preview does not.
Lowest cost at scale: Atria Dawn Preview — Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of MiMo-V2.5's $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.
Largest single-prompt input: MiMo-V2.5 — Its 1M window is about 3.8× larger than Atria Dawn Preview's 256K tokens, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume: Atria Dawn Preview — At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts MiMo-V2.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases: MiMo-V2.5 — Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is best-in-class among tested models on several of shanghai ai lab's own benchmarks, including browsecomp (92.5, ahead of gpt-5.6 sol's 92.2) and deepsearchqa (96.0): Atria Dawn Preview — It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding: MiMo-V2.5 — That is its strongest area.
Atria Dawn Preview: where it fits
A free, MIT-licensed 744B open-weight model from Shanghai AI Lab that beat GPT-5.6 Sol on the BrowseComp benchmark — released quietly, weights before paper. Released September 11, 2026 by Shanghai AI Laboratory, it is built for best-in-class among tested models on several of Shanghai AI Lab's own benchmarks, including BrowseComp (92.5, ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol's 92.2) and DeepSearchQA (96.0), 744B-parameter MoE built on a GLM-5.2 base, released under a fully open MIT license, and free to self-host — no API pricing, run entirely on your own hardware.
Its trade-offs are real: context window is reported inconsistently across trackers — most list 256K tokens, at least one lists 1M; unconfirmed which is accurate, released quietly, with weights and an API posted to GitHub before Shanghai AI Lab's own technical report went up on arXiv days later, and a lab research preview rather than a commercial product — support and update cadence are unclear. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
MiMo-V2.5: where it fits
Xiaomi's cheap omnimodal model — Pro-level agentic perception across image and video at a fraction of the cost. Released April 22, 2026 by Xiaomi, it is built for native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding, very low cost (~half the inference of the Pro tier), agent-framework integration, and 1M context for full documents in one pass.
Its trade-offs: not the deepest reasoning tier (see V2.5-Pro), and limited Western tooling and support. At $0.14 in / $0.28 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Atria Dawn Preview and MiMo-V2.5 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Atria Dawn Preview costs less per token; MiMo-V2.5 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Atria Dawn Preview for best-in-class among tested models on several of shanghai ai lab's own benchmarks, including browsecomp (92.5, ahead of gpt-5.6 sol's 92.2) and deepsearchqa (96.0), MiMo-V2.5 for native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Frequently asked questions
Is Atria Dawn Preview or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Atria Dawn Preview leans toward best-in-class among tested models on several of shanghai ai lab's own benchmarks, including browsecomp (92.5, ahead of gpt-5.6 sol's 92.2) and deepsearchqa (96.0) while MiMo-V2.5 leans toward native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Atria Dawn Preview or MiMo-V2.5?
Atria Dawn Preview is cheaper — Open weight (self-host / free) vs $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 — 1M vs 256K tokens, about 3.8× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Atria Dawn Preview and MiMo-V2.5 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Atria Dawn Preview, MiMo-V2.5 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Atria Dawn Preview or MiMo-V2.5?
Atria Dawn Preview — released September 11, 2026, about 5 months after MiMo-V2.5.
Atria Dawn Preview vs MiMo-V2.5
Shanghai AI Laboratory · China | Xiaomi · China · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Atria Dawn Preview for best-in-class among tested models on several of shanghai ai lab's own benchmarks, including browsecomp (92.5, ahead of gpt-5.6 sol's 92.2) and deepsearchqa (96.0) or 744b-parameter moe built on a glm-5.2 base, released under a fully open mit license. Pick MiMo-V2.5 for native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding or very low cost (~half the inference of the pro tier). On a tight budget at scale, Atria Dawn Preview is the value pick.
Atria Dawn Preview (Shanghai AI Laboratory) and MiMo-V2.5 (Xiaomi) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Atria Dawn Preview is a free, MIT-licensed 744B open-weight model from Shanghai AI Lab that beat GPT-5.6 Sol on the BrowseComp benchmark — released quietly, weights before paper. MiMo-V2.5 is xiaomi's cheap omnimodal model — Pro-level agentic perception across image and video at a fraction of the cost. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
▸Context window: MiMo-V2.5 holds 3.8× more — 1M (~1,500 pages) vs 256K tokens (~393 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
▸Recency: Atria Dawn Preview is the newer model by about 5 months (released September 11, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
Spec
Atria Dawn Preview
MiMo-V2.5
Provider
Shanghai AI Laboratory (China)
Xiaomi (China)
Released
September 11, 2026
April 22, 2026
Context window
256K tokens (~393 pages)
1M (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)
Open weight (self-host / free)
$0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
Yes — self-hostable
Yes — self-hostable
Modalities
text
text, image, audio, video, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Best-in-class among tested models on several of Shanghai AI Lab's own benchmarks, including BrowseComp (92.5, ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol's 92.2) and DeepSearchQA (96.0)
Atria Dawn Preview
A free, MIT-licensed 744B open-weight model from Shanghai AI Lab that beat GPT-5.6 Sol on the BrowseComp benchmark — released quietly, weights before paper — and it is the newer of the two.
744B-parameter MoE built on a GLM-5.2 base, released under a fully open MIT license
Atria Dawn Preview
Atria Dawn Preview lists 744B-parameter MoE built on a GLM-5.2 base, released under a fully open MIT license among its strengths; MiMo-V2.5 does not.
Free to self-host — no API pricing, run entirely on your own hardware
Atria Dawn Preview
Atria Dawn Preview lists free to self-host — no API pricing, run entirely on your own hardware among its strengths; MiMo-V2.5 does not.
Native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi's cheap omnimodal model — Pro-level agentic perception across image and video at a fraction of the cost — and it carries the larger 1M context.
Very low cost (~half the inference of the Pro tier)
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 lists very low cost (~half the inference of the Pro tier) among its strengths; Atria Dawn Preview does not.
Agent-framework integration
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 lists agent-framework integration among its strengths; Atria Dawn Preview does not.
Lowest cost at scale
Atria Dawn Preview
Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of MiMo-V2.5's $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.
Largest single-prompt input
MiMo-V2.5
Its 1M window is about 3.8× larger than Atria Dawn Preview's 256K tokens, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ Atria Dawn Preview
At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts MiMo-V2.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ MiMo-V2.5
Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is best-in-class among tested models on several of shanghai ai lab's own benchmarks, including browsecomp (92.5, ahead of gpt-5.6 sol's 92.2) and deepsearchqa (96.0)
→ Atria Dawn Preview
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding
→ MiMo-V2.5
That is its strongest area.
Atria Dawn Preview: where it fits
A free, MIT-licensed 744B open-weight model from Shanghai AI Lab that beat GPT-5.6 Sol on the BrowseComp benchmark — released quietly, weights before paper. Released September 11, 2026 by Shanghai AI Laboratory, it is built for best-in-class among tested models on several of Shanghai AI Lab's own benchmarks, including BrowseComp (92.5, ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol's 92.2) and DeepSearchQA (96.0), 744B-parameter MoE built on a GLM-5.2 base, released under a fully open MIT license, and free to self-host — no API pricing, run entirely on your own hardware.
Its trade-offs are real: context window is reported inconsistently across trackers — most list 256K tokens, at least one lists 1M; unconfirmed which is accurate, released quietly, with weights and an API posted to GitHub before Shanghai AI Lab's own technical report went up on arXiv days later, and a lab research preview rather than a commercial product — support and update cadence are unclear. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
MiMo-V2.5: where it fits
Xiaomi's cheap omnimodal model — Pro-level agentic perception across image and video at a fraction of the cost. Released April 22, 2026 by Xiaomi, it is built for native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding, very low cost (~half the inference of the Pro tier), agent-framework integration, and 1M context for full documents in one pass.
Its trade-offs: not the deepest reasoning tier (see V2.5-Pro), and limited Western tooling and support. At $0.14 in / $0.28 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Atria Dawn Preview and MiMo-V2.5 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Atria Dawn Preview costs less per token; MiMo-V2.5 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Atria Dawn Preview for best-in-class among tested models on several of shanghai ai lab's own benchmarks, including browsecomp (92.5, ahead of gpt-5.6 sol's 92.2) and deepsearchqa (96.0), MiMo-V2.5 for native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both Atria Dawn Preview and MiMo-V2.5 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
Is Atria Dawn Preview or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Atria Dawn Preview leans toward best-in-class among tested models on several of shanghai ai lab's own benchmarks, including browsecomp (92.5, ahead of gpt-5.6 sol's 92.2) and deepsearchqa (96.0) while MiMo-V2.5 leans toward native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Atria Dawn Preview or MiMo-V2.5?
Atria Dawn Preview is cheaper — Open weight (self-host / free) vs $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 — 1M vs 256K tokens, about 3.8× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Atria Dawn Preview and MiMo-V2.5 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Atria Dawn Preview, MiMo-V2.5 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Atria Dawn Preview or MiMo-V2.5?
Atria Dawn Preview — released September 11, 2026, about 5 months after MiMo-V2.5.
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.