Amazon Nova Pro vs Ling-2.6-1T

Amazon · US  |  Ant Group · China · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Amazon Nova Pro for multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20 or deep aws and bedrock integration for enterprise pipelines. Pick Ling-2.6-1T for a trillion-parameter moe (1t total / ~50-63b active) from ant group - the fintech giant behind alipay - entering ai at frontier scale or fully open weights under the permissive mit license, unusual for a model this large. Choose Ling-2.6-1T if you need self-hosting or data privacy; Amazon Nova Pro if you want a managed API.

Amazon Nova Pro (Amazon, US) and Ling-2.6-1T (Ant Group, China) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. Amazon Nova Pro is amazon's multimodal Bedrock model at $0.80/$3.20 with a 300K window — an enterprise-integrated generalist, not a frontier model. Ling-2.6-1T is ant Group's trillion-parameter, MIT-licensed open model - a fintech giant's frontier-scale entry into the Chinese open-weight AI race. They diverge most on price, context window and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecAmazon Nova ProLing-2.6-1T
ProviderAmazon (US) Ant Group (China)
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024 April 2026
Context window300K (~450 pages) 256K (~393 pages)
Price (in/out)$0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only Yes — self-hostable
Modalitiestext, image, video, code text, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20

Amazon Nova Pro

Ling-2.6-1T is comparatively weak here — exact release date is disputed across sources (reports range from mid to late April 2026)

Deep AWS and Bedrock integration for enterprise pipelines

Amazon Nova Pro

Amazon Nova Pro lists deep AWS and Bedrock integration for enterprise pipelines among its strengths; Ling-2.6-1T does not.

Balanced cost-to-capability for general business tasks

Amazon Nova Pro

Amazon Nova Pro lists balanced cost-to-capability for general business tasks among its strengths; Ling-2.6-1T does not.

A trillion-parameter MoE (1T total / ~50-63B active) from Ant Group - the fintech giant behind Alipay - entering AI at frontier scale

Ling-2.6-1T

At $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Amazon Nova Pro ($0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.

Fully open weights under the permissive MIT license, unusual for a model this large

Ling-2.6-1T

Open weights make this possible at all — Amazon Nova Pro is API-only, so it cannot leave the vendor's servers.

A companion 'Ring' reasoning variant claims gold-medal-level IMO/CMO math scores using a hybrid linear-attention architecture

Ling-2.6-1T

Amazon Nova Pro is comparatively weak here — not a frontier reasoning or coding model against 2026 flagships

Lowest cost at scale

Ling-2.6-1T

At $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

Ling-2.6-1T

At $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Amazon Nova Pro, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

Amazon Nova Pro

Larger 300K window fits more in one prompt.

A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs

Ling-2.6-1T

Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; Amazon Nova Pro is API-only.

Anyone whose priority is multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20

Amazon Nova Pro

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is a trillion-parameter moe (1t total / ~50-63b active) from ant group - the fintech giant behind alipay - entering ai at frontier scale

Ling-2.6-1T

That is its strongest area.

An enterprise with regional data-residency rules

Amazon Nova Pro or Ling-2.6-1T

Origin (US vs China) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.

Amazon Nova Pro: where it fits

Amazon's multimodal Bedrock model at $0.80/$3.20 with a 300K window — an enterprise-integrated generalist, not a frontier model. Released December 5, 2024 by Amazon, it is built for multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20, deep AWS and Bedrock integration for enterprise pipelines, balanced cost-to-capability for general business tasks, and a 300K context for long documents and mixed media.

Its trade-offs are real: not a frontier reasoning or coding model against 2026 flagships, no published SWE-Bench Verified score, best value is realised inside the AWS ecosystem, and late-2024 model — older than most of the field here. At $0.8 in / $3.2 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

Ling-2.6-1T: where it fits

Ant Group's trillion-parameter, MIT-licensed open model - a fintech giant's frontier-scale entry into the Chinese open-weight AI race. Released April 2026 by Ant Group, it is built for a trillion-parameter MoE (1T total / ~50-63B active) from Ant Group - the fintech giant behind Alipay - entering AI at frontier scale, fully open weights under the permissive MIT license, unusual for a model this large, a companion 'Ring' reasoning variant claims gold-medal-level IMO/CMO math scores using a hybrid linear-attention architecture, and a major Chinese lab with real financial backing, distinct from DeepSeek, Alibaba, or Moonshot.

Its trade-offs: pricing shown is third-party hosting, not an official Ant Group rate card, newer entrant to LLMs specifically - less track record than dedicated AI labs, and exact release date is disputed across sources (reports range from mid to late April 2026). At $0.3 in / $2.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

The defining split here is open vs. closed. Ling-2.6-1T gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. Amazon Nova Pro gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.

Want both Amazon Nova Pro and Ling-2.6-1T without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Pro or Ling-2.6-1T better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Amazon Nova Pro leans toward multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20 while Ling-2.6-1T leans toward a trillion-parameter moe (1t total / ~50-63b active) from ant group - the fintech giant behind alipay - entering ai at frontier scale, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Ling-2.6-1T?

Ling-2.6-1T is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while Amazon Nova Pro is API-metered at $0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.

Which has the bigger context window?

Effectively neither — 300K vs 256K is a difference of a few percent. Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both Amazon Nova Pro and Ling-2.6-1T together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Amazon Nova Pro, Ling-2.6-1T and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Amazon Nova Pro or Ling-2.6-1T?

Ling-2.6-1T — released April 2026, about 16 months after Amazon Nova Pro.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.