Pick Amazon Nova Pro for multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20 or deep aws and bedrock integration for enterprise pipelines. Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 for fastest claude model or near-frontier coding for its tier — 73.3% on swe-bench verified. On a tight budget at scale, Amazon Nova Pro is the value pick.
Amazon Nova Pro (Amazon) and Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Amazon Nova Pro is amazon's multimodal Bedrock model at $0.80/$3.20 with a 300K window — an enterprise-integrated generalist, not a frontier model. Claude Haiku 4.5 is anthropic's fastest, most compact model — built for speed and volume. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences
Price: nearly identical — $0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens vs $1/$5 per 1M tokens. Cost will not be the deciding factor here.
Context window: Amazon Nova Pro holds 1.5× more — 300K (~450 pages) vs 200K (~300 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
Recency: Claude Haiku 4.5 is the newer model by about 10 months (released October 15, 2025), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Specifications
Spec
Amazon Nova Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5
Provider
Amazon (US)
Anthropic (US)
Released
December 5, 2024
October 15, 2025
Context window
300K (~450 pages)
200K (~300 pages)
Price (in/out)
$0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens
$1/$5 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
No — API only
No — API only
Modalities
text, image, video, code
text, image, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
73.3%
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20: Amazon Nova Pro — Amazon's multimodal Bedrock model at $0.80/$3.20 with a 300K window — an enterprise-integrated generalist, not a frontier model — and it runs cheaper at $0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens.
Deep AWS and Bedrock integration for enterprise pipelines: Amazon Nova Pro — Amazon's multimodal Bedrock model at $0.80/$3.20 with a 300K window — an enterprise-integrated generalist, not a frontier model — and it carries the larger 300K context.
Balanced cost-to-capability for general business tasks: Amazon Nova Pro — At $0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1/$5 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.
Fastest Claude model: Claude Haiku 4.5 — Amazon Nova Pro is comparatively weak here — not a frontier reasoning or coding model against 2026 flagships
Near-frontier coding for its tier — 73.3% on SWE-Bench Verified: Claude Haiku 4.5 — Anthropic's fastest, most compact model — built for speed and volume — and it is the newer of the two.
Low-latency, high-volume API calls: Claude Haiku 4.5 — Claude Haiku 4.5 lists low-latency, high-volume API calls among its strengths; Amazon Nova Pro does not.
Lowest cost at scale: Amazon Nova Pro — At $0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input: Amazon Nova Pro — Its 300K window is about 1.5× larger than Claude Haiku 4.5's 200K, fitting roughly 450 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume: Amazon Nova Pro — At $0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Haiku 4.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases: Amazon Nova Pro — Larger 300K window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20: Amazon Nova Pro — It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is fastest claude model: Claude Haiku 4.5 — That is its strongest area.
Amazon Nova Pro: where it fits
Amazon's multimodal Bedrock model at $0.80/$3.20 with a 300K window — an enterprise-integrated generalist, not a frontier model. Released December 5, 2024 by Amazon, it is built for multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20, deep AWS and Bedrock integration for enterprise pipelines, balanced cost-to-capability for general business tasks, and a 300K context for long documents and mixed media.
Its trade-offs are real: not a frontier reasoning or coding model against 2026 flagships, no published SWE-Bench Verified score, best value is realised inside the AWS ecosystem, and late-2024 model — older than most of the field here. At $0.8 in / $3.2 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
Claude Haiku 4.5: where it fits
Anthropic's fastest, most compact model — built for speed and volume. Released October 15, 2025 by Anthropic, it is built for fastest Claude model, near-frontier coding for its tier — 73.3% on SWE-Bench Verified, low-latency, high-volume API calls, and cheapest Claude tier at $1/$5.
Its trade-offs: smallest context in the family (200K), and not for deep reasoning. At $1 in / $5 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Amazon Nova Pro and Claude Haiku 4.5 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Amazon Nova Pro costs less per token; Amazon Nova Pro holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Amazon Nova Pro for multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20, Claude Haiku 4.5 for fastest claude model. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Claude Haiku 4.5 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Amazon Nova Pro, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Amazon Nova Pro leans toward multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20 while Claude Haiku 4.5 leans toward fastest claude model, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Claude Haiku 4.5?
Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper — $0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens vs $1/$5 per 1M tokens, roughly 1.3× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
Amazon Nova Pro — 300K vs 200K, about 1.5× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Amazon Nova Pro and Claude Haiku 4.5 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Amazon Nova Pro, Claude Haiku 4.5 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Amazon Nova Pro or Claude Haiku 4.5?
Claude Haiku 4.5 — released October 15, 2025, about 10 months after Amazon Nova Pro.
Amazon Nova Pro vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Amazon · US | Anthropic · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Amazon Nova Pro for multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20 or deep aws and bedrock integration for enterprise pipelines. Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 for fastest claude model or near-frontier coding for its tier — 73.3% on swe-bench verified. On a tight budget at scale, Amazon Nova Pro is the value pick.
Amazon Nova Pro (Amazon) and Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Amazon Nova Pro is amazon's multimodal Bedrock model at $0.80/$3.20 with a 300K window — an enterprise-integrated generalist, not a frontier model. Claude Haiku 4.5 is anthropic's fastest, most compact model — built for speed and volume. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
▸Price: nearly identical — $0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens vs $1/$5 per 1M tokens. Cost will not be the deciding factor here.
▸Context window: Amazon Nova Pro holds 1.5× more — 300K (~450 pages) vs 200K (~300 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
▸Recency: Claude Haiku 4.5 is the newer model by about 10 months (released October 15, 2025), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
Spec
Amazon Nova Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5
Provider
Amazon (US)
Anthropic (US)
Released
December 5, 2024
October 15, 2025
Context window
300K (~450 pages)
200K (~300 pages)
Price (in/out)
$0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens
$1/$5 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
No — API only
No — API only
Modalities
text, image, video, code
text, image, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
73.3%
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20
Amazon Nova Pro
Amazon's multimodal Bedrock model at $0.80/$3.20 with a 300K window — an enterprise-integrated generalist, not a frontier model — and it runs cheaper at $0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens.
Deep AWS and Bedrock integration for enterprise pipelines
Amazon Nova Pro
Amazon's multimodal Bedrock model at $0.80/$3.20 with a 300K window — an enterprise-integrated generalist, not a frontier model — and it carries the larger 300K context.
Balanced cost-to-capability for general business tasks
Amazon Nova Pro
At $0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1/$5 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.
Fastest Claude model
Claude Haiku 4.5
Amazon Nova Pro is comparatively weak here — not a frontier reasoning or coding model against 2026 flagships
Near-frontier coding for its tier — 73.3% on SWE-Bench Verified
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic's fastest, most compact model — built for speed and volume — and it is the newer of the two.
Low-latency, high-volume API calls
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 lists low-latency, high-volume API calls among its strengths; Amazon Nova Pro does not.
Lowest cost at scale
Amazon Nova Pro
At $0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input
Amazon Nova Pro
Its 300K window is about 1.5× larger than Claude Haiku 4.5's 200K, fitting roughly 450 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ Amazon Nova Pro
At $0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Haiku 4.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ Amazon Nova Pro
Larger 300K window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20
→ Amazon Nova Pro
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is fastest claude model
→ Claude Haiku 4.5
That is its strongest area.
Amazon Nova Pro: where it fits
Amazon's multimodal Bedrock model at $0.80/$3.20 with a 300K window — an enterprise-integrated generalist, not a frontier model. Released December 5, 2024 by Amazon, it is built for multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20, deep AWS and Bedrock integration for enterprise pipelines, balanced cost-to-capability for general business tasks, and a 300K context for long documents and mixed media.
Its trade-offs are real: not a frontier reasoning or coding model against 2026 flagships, no published SWE-Bench Verified score, best value is realised inside the AWS ecosystem, and late-2024 model — older than most of the field here. At $0.8 in / $3.2 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
Claude Haiku 4.5: where it fits
Anthropic's fastest, most compact model — built for speed and volume. Released October 15, 2025 by Anthropic, it is built for fastest Claude model, near-frontier coding for its tier — 73.3% on SWE-Bench Verified, low-latency, high-volume API calls, and cheapest Claude tier at $1/$5.
Its trade-offs: smallest context in the family (200K), and not for deep reasoning. At $1 in / $5 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Amazon Nova Pro and Claude Haiku 4.5 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Amazon Nova Pro costs less per token; Amazon Nova Pro holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Amazon Nova Pro for multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20, Claude Haiku 4.5 for fastest claude model. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both Amazon Nova Pro and Claude Haiku 4.5 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Claude Haiku 4.5 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Amazon Nova Pro, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Amazon Nova Pro leans toward multimodal input across text, image and video at $0.80/$3.20 while Claude Haiku 4.5 leans toward fastest claude model, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Claude Haiku 4.5?
Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper — $0.8/$3.2 per 1M tokens vs $1/$5 per 1M tokens, roughly 1.3× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
Amazon Nova Pro — 300K vs 200K, about 1.5× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Amazon Nova Pro and Claude Haiku 4.5 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Amazon Nova Pro, Claude Haiku 4.5 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Amazon Nova Pro or Claude Haiku 4.5?
Claude Haiku 4.5 — released October 15, 2025, about 10 months after Amazon Nova Pro.
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.